Post by Rune on Feb 18, 2022 12:30:53 GMT
Testing Asgard's Wrath - Rift CV1 ss 2.5 vs. Index res 400%.
In short - this is Rift CV1 ss 2.5 (27 mill pixels) screenshot (original, but seems to be reduced in size here to fit the page, otherwise click on the attachement to see full res):
This is Index res 400% screenshot:
Maybe some think both look good. But let's focus - here are images showing the full res :
Rift CV1 ss 2.5 - full res:
Index res 400% - full res:
Note than I'm closer to these pillars using Index than CV1, and closer should mean sharper - thus Index has higher res and closer distance - still CV1 looks much sharper!
Rift CV1 ss 2.5 - full res:
Index res 400% - full res:
The Index image is bigger, because res 400% results in a larger image (=1820x1820 screenshot) than CV1 ss 2.5 (=1536x1536 screenshot). Looks like the CV1 is a lot sharper here (and felt the same in game, thus also through-the-lenses) - could be caused by some restrictions with Revive?
I always thought that LCD was the problem - but these are raw screenshots - not through the lenses!
So the blur comes from how Steam treats TAA? Or Revive? And has nothing to do with LCD - unless LCD triggers some strange settings making TAA look blurry?
I would expect screenshots to be similar - but the CV1, even using lower res, is much sharper than Index using a massive res 400%! This makes little sense - unless the blur is created by other mechanisms than just choice of oled/LCD...
Did Revive dev undersample Asgard's Wrath to gain performance? Really looks like I have to reach res 500 - 600% with the Index the get same image quality as Rift CV1 ss 2.5!
Do let me know what you're thinking! :-)
In short - this is Rift CV1 ss 2.5 (27 mill pixels) screenshot (original, but seems to be reduced in size here to fit the page, otherwise click on the attachement to see full res):
This is Index res 400% screenshot:
Maybe some think both look good. But let's focus - here are images showing the full res :
Rift CV1 ss 2.5 - full res:
Index res 400% - full res:
Note than I'm closer to these pillars using Index than CV1, and closer should mean sharper - thus Index has higher res and closer distance - still CV1 looks much sharper!
Rift CV1 ss 2.5 - full res:
Index res 400% - full res:
The Index image is bigger, because res 400% results in a larger image (=1820x1820 screenshot) than CV1 ss 2.5 (=1536x1536 screenshot). Looks like the CV1 is a lot sharper here (and felt the same in game, thus also through-the-lenses) - could be caused by some restrictions with Revive?
I always thought that LCD was the problem - but these are raw screenshots - not through the lenses!
So the blur comes from how Steam treats TAA? Or Revive? And has nothing to do with LCD - unless LCD triggers some strange settings making TAA look blurry?
I would expect screenshots to be similar - but the CV1, even using lower res, is much sharper than Index using a massive res 400%! This makes little sense - unless the blur is created by other mechanisms than just choice of oled/LCD...
Did Revive dev undersample Asgard's Wrath to gain performance? Really looks like I have to reach res 500 - 600% with the Index the get same image quality as Rift CV1 ss 2.5!
Do let me know what you're thinking! :-)
Attachments:
